“My formula works on everyone as long as they’re consistent. I can shape anyone’s body into a teeny-tiny dancer type.”
…thus spake professional trainer to the stars Tracey Anderson.
I have one question for Ms Anderson - are you out of your mind? I really, really wanted to use the term teeny-tiny mind, but that’s just insulting, isn’t it. What are you thinking making such an irresponsible statement?
Why is this irresponsible?
Simple: not everyone can have a teeny-tiny dancer body. To even promote this thinking is one whacked out sense of reality. I suppose this is no different than the fashion industry that uses the airbrush and photo manipulation to make all their rake thin models so long limbed and necked. Any proper exercise routine and diet should take into account a healthy body image - which includes weight. There is something terribly wrong with thinking every woman should aspire to this particular body shape. She should have a more flexible attitude towards fitness.
Ms Anderson also claims that by following her diet, you can loose from 3 to 5 pounds a week. Whoa! Talk to any nutrition expert and they’ll immediately say 5 pounds? That’s bordering on dangerous for the average person. 1 to 2 pounds a week is recommended - it’s hard to lose weight, but then you didn’t gain it all at once, so why should you expect to shed it all at once. However Ms Anderson says she has developed this supernatural ability to help women attain this unrealistic goal after:
… testing 100 women for five years independently (because “the government isn’t going to fund seeing if you can get a Victoria’s Secret butt out of any woman!”).
Terribly scientific, don’t you know. 100 women! Whoo hooo! That’s a great sampling of the human population. So what body shapes did you choose? Did you sample a wide variety of women? Or is that too much to ask?
In case you don’t recognise the name, Tracey Anderson is the person partially responsible for Madonna’s over amped, over pumped body. Terribly attractive body eh? OH OH can I have one just like hers? Can I?
Oh wait, US magazine has published her diet - I think I’ll pass on the body and the diet. With diet she proposes falling well under the recommended 1300 calories per day (some food layouts are under 800 calories!) I think I’d rather gnaw my paws off rather than indulge in this insanity. Plus the stupid ass diet bans all spices.
NO SPICES? WHY BOTHER GETTING UP IN THE MORNING.
Hell, just crawl under the bed and eat the dust bunnies. It’d be as much fun. I have yet to see any study that proves spices promote weight gain. Now the basics of her diet aren’t bad - just far too limiting and far too boring. Here’s a typical day’s worth of food:
Breakfast
1 cup Kashi cereal, with ½ cup plain — or vanilla — nonfat rice milk
Lunch
3 oz fresh turkey breast with ¼ cup each of cucumbers, alfalfa sprouts and beets, plus 1 slice whole-grain bread
Snack
1 cup fresh strawberries
Dinner
3 to 5 oz grilled sea bass with ½ cup steamed fresh green beans
She has Kashi almost every day. Great cereal, but I bore easily and want variety. Well if you don’t want the Kashi, you can opt for what is offered on a different day - 1 cup of nonfat rice milk and 1 poached egg. Yum, yum, yum, I feel full.
There isn’t anything intrinsically wrong with the food, but it just isn’t enough, nor is it interesting enough to encourage me to stick with it. Add this to the punishing workout she proposes (“You should be dripping sweat and taking very few breaks”) and I can see myself going face first into the Hostess Ho Ho’s by the 5th day. I did a quick calculation of how many calories this particular day will supply you with and it comes to a whopping 750 - give or take 100, depending upon how you calculate. I was having a few problems figuring out how many calories you get in a 1/4 cup of cucs, sprouts and beets so I over compensated. If you want me exercising properly then you bloody well better fuel my body first.
750 measly calories on top of a punishing exercise routine? That isn’t enough to keep a gerbil happy. You bet you’ll be losing weight. Right up until the hospital hooks you up to their IV and starts to force you to eat properly. Bleck! This diet will encourage me to cheat and feel bad - both mentally and physically. Starvation is not appealing.
Ah, but she’s Hollywood approved, so I guess this is all right. I mean, where else are you going to look for a proper, healthy diet and exercise routine? Heaven forbid you should use common sense.
Stumble it!



9 responses so far ↓
1
Bimmy the Bookish
// May 4, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Gosh Catpaw,
i only went away for a couple of days, and while i was loafing about enjoying myself you’ve posted so much stuff, so much great ranting, I’m quite exhausted just reading it!
I’ll have to come back again later to read a bit more - phew.
You are right as usual - so eloquently.
2
catpaw
// May 4, 2008 at 8:30 pm
Sorry, I’ll try to be a bit nicer this week. I’ll just go to bed and hide under the covers until the weekend.
Let me know when you catch up.
3
Zandria
// May 6, 2008 at 8:01 pm
You’re so right about this. I saw that article, too, along with the sample meal plans. As someone who has counted calories for years, I could just glance through them and see that her meal plans fell well below 1000 calories a day.
UNDER 1000 calories a day? Is she crazy? On top of all that working out?
Great post.
4
catpaw
// May 6, 2008 at 8:11 pm
Welcome Zandria,
Always nice to hear from a new reader.
I was astonished when I went through the diet. It is really irresponsible.
5
Roufa Tav Gosou & Mimi Lass
// May 15, 2008 at 9:36 am
Man! With such little food you can save more than enough money for the antidepressants that surely you will need to hang on to this life!
6
catpaw
// May 15, 2008 at 9:45 am
I was wondering how anyone sustain a will to live on this meagre serving… Thanks for the answer DRUGS!
7
storm
// May 20, 2008 at 7:30 am
I think what has been said in that large statement is quite ignorant. I understand where you are coming from, but i think you need to realise that you can’t make empty assumptions. Tracy has obviously studied fitness, nutrition, diet and exercise etc. Everybody is different and needs to be exercised in a way to tackle which muscles need attention/which parts need to burn fat etc in order to create a slimline figure suited to the said bodyshape. As for the diet, this isn’t a long term thing, with her exercise regime it allows for a more adventurous yet sensible way of eating. The sample diet is designed to help people shift excess weight if they have a bit to lose. The reason she excludes spices etc if because she wants to keep the palate pure. With non processed/man-made products. She never said spices where fattening, but many spices contain wheat which can bloat the tummy and upset it as it is not a natural product.
She’s just another trainer doing her job and trying to help those who need and want to be helped.
8
storm
// May 20, 2008 at 7:33 am
p.s - everyone can have a tiny body,to suit their body shape. Fat between skin and bone is created not born, so anyone can be trim to the point of their body frame, obviously some people have a bigger bone frame than others.
9
catpaw
// May 20, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Storm,
Sorry to disagree with you, but it is a dangerous regiment to follow - even short term. She does not allow enough callories to keep the body going, even for the short term.
As for the spices - again I disagree. NONE of my spices contain wheat. NONE, period. If your spices contain wheat, then you better check where you are purchasing them. My garam masala spice doesn’t contain wheat, nor does my fresh chili, nor do any other spices.
Some off the shelf spice mixes may contain a trace amount of spice, but this is such a small amount that it would be minimal. This is a false premise for weight loss.
My point with her is she has an incorrect image about what is attainable for women. She has pigeonholed women into ONE body size fits all. It has nothing to do with the fat between the bone and skin.
Leave a Comment