Archive for category Evils of Advertising

Scrapping the bottom of the barrel… yet again

Posted by catpaw on Wednesday, 4 August, 2010

Every once in awhile, the fashion industry does something that makes even my jaw drop. Hard to believe, given my utter contempt for it, but recently they didn’t just hit rock bottom with their desperate attempt to garner attention, they dug themselves all the way to Hell.

In an ode to bankrupt ideals, South Korean fashion label Lewitt commissioned a short film (now yanked from every site I checked) that featured model Abbey Lee Kershaw fleeing from an unidentified danger and throwing herself off a roof. She is then shown falling over and over, in slow motion, wearing a different outfit with each fall. It’s done in a dreamy, romanticized way that is supposed to evoke a sense of “Ohh I want that”.

The problems with this are many fold. First, it is another attempt by the fashion industry to glamorize violence against women… again. Somehow this poor waif-like creature who commits suicide to escape whatever peril she is in, is supposed to be envied because she’s wearing must-have outfits. Hmm yes I want to wear what a dead woman is wearing – tres chic! We’ve seen this over and over in the past. The most egregious was the “murder as fashion” segment of an America’s Top Model episode.

Second, in doing a bit of research before hitting the keyboard, I discovered South Korea has the 8th highest suicide rate in the world, the second highest (just a hair under Mainland China) in female suicides. You would think, or hope, a company from a country rocked by numerous high profile suicides – including one of the country’s top models, Daul Kim – would show just a bit more common sense. Compassion is never going to happen, common sense is all we can hope for.

Daul Kim’s sad death at the age of 20 seems to have no effect on the people who treat women like nothing more than cattle ready for the slaughter. The fashion industry is not solely responsible for Kim’s death in Nov 2009; she was haunted by many demons that were aggravated by her career. Nor are they solely responsible for the high rate of suicide within South Korea. HOWEVER, they do bear responsibility for exploiting women and creating monumentally unrealistic visions of beauty that push girls and women to extremes to meet this phantom of beauty. The unending stream of warped images from the advertising and fashion industry must have an effect. We can’t simply say don’t watch them or worse don’t pay attention to them because this is hopelessly naive.

Blog after blog exposes the over photo-shopped models who have had limbs moved into positions that are anatomically impossible, breasts air brushed away (or in one case moved so low they were sitting just above the poor woman’s navel), thinned so badly the women look like sick bobble heads, belly buttons removed (just what is the industry’s obsession with belly buttons?), elongating arms and legs to the point the women resemble something out of a sci-fi movie, fingers elongated to such an extreme I wonder if the people doing the work even know what a female body looks like. If they want clothes hangers, stop the hypocrisy and put the damned clothes on hangers. Stop redesigning the human body to suit these warped views, and start showing women that come in all shapes, all sizes.

The industry bears a great responsibility for exploiting the notion that violence and fear is glamorous. That somehow brutalizing the vulnerable and weak is acceptable, even envied. I’ve used the term bankrupt ideals before, but it is the only phrase that can fully explain an industry that celebrates self-abuse and violence. No other industry would get away with promoting this type of agenda. Why do they get away with it? Because the world idolizes everything the industry does. They are the neo-gods of the modern world. Legions of magazines drool over every design, and quote even the most inane blatherings from designers who live in a world where they can abuse the female image and be rewarded for their efforts. They seemed to have forgotten Hubert de Givenchy’s statement on fashion, “The dress must follow the body of a woman, not the body following the shape of the dress.”

We’ve endured “heroin chic”, size zero or go home, designers who show open contempt for the female body in their battle against “plus size” models, murder as a fashion statement and now this. When is enough, enough?

There is nothing wrong with wanting tall, willowy models to showcase your work. There is something wrong with photo-shopping the models until they look like they are about to die from malnutrition or redo their bodies to suit a perverse image of what they think the female body should be. There is something wrong with using violence and emotional desperation to sell a warped image of beauty. There is something wrong with an industry that hectors it’s employees (and yes models are employees) to such an extent that anorexia and bulimia are the bywords for employment.

A remedial course in anatomy should be mandatory before anyone is allowed to work in either the fashion industry or advertising (kissing cousins in maintaining high standards of stupidity). This won’t happen until the world stops treating everything the fashion industry does with such reverence. They are employers who exploit their workers and their audience.

Suicide in South Korea
Frockwriter’s blog on the subject
Photoshop Disasters blog they spotlight the entire advertising industry’s misuse of over-touching photos.

This can’t be healthy

Posted by catpaw on Tuesday, 29 December, 2009

I’m suffering from a major sinus meltdown at the moment which means I’m housebound and claustrophobic. Hardly any voice, crappy feeling and just not a happy creature. Which means, I have an excess amount of time on my hands to watch incredibly trashy tv (now I remember why I prefer to work during the day) and cruise the Internet for weird stories. This particular story has been floating around my peripheral vision for awhile but I never had the time to deal with it. Anyone heard of the Duggar clan in the US? … the 19 and counting family. Its an exploitative travesty broadcast on TLC  TV.

In case you don’t lurk in all the wrong places, TLC (formerly a respected TV station that touted itself as The Learning Channel) has degraded into a “reality” focused network that glories in exploiting the vulnerable. I use the term ‘reality’ knowing full well what the public is being served has little to do with the truth and everything to do with a marketing behemoth.

Doubt what I’m saying? Then explain the late and noxious child labour show Jon and Kate Plus 8′s  24 hour coverage of those poor kids- all so the parents could have their 15 minutes of fame. The spectacular implosion of the Gosselin marriage and accusations of child labour violations points to a serious problem with shows like this. Sorry, but no network should be following any family with children around for “edutainment”.

The fact the network pays the parents to put their children on TV so the world can live vicariously through the family’s ups and downs, to me is a violation of child labour laws and decency. The children have no privacy. Imagine growing up with the knowledge that strangers know the most intimate parts of your life – everything from potty training to emotional meltdowns.  It was my misconception that parents were supposed to protect their children, not exploit them. TLC has a glut of this type of  show. It’s one thing for adults to willingly participate in one – although it has become increasingly obvious that the networks prey on the mentally vulnerable to increase their ratings – but an entirely different matter for adults to sign up children to participate. Now that the cameras are gone from the Jon & Kate household, Kate has said the children are upset that the cameras are all gone. The fact this woman things this is bad – not the cameras being taken away, but the children upset at their leaving – indicates a cold hearted view of her children as commodities, not toddlers. This woman has NO concept of personal responsibility and is in it for what she can get: “society has a responsibility to help with the children, since modern medicine promotes the use of fertility drugs, which can lead to multiple births”. Hey Kate, how about you take some responsibility for your decisions.

This leads me to another of  TLC’s baby bootie shows – the Duggar clan’s 18 and counting… actually it’s 19 now. Yes 19 children all on TV so people can gawk at them and the parents can keep popping out children (in an already overburdened world) in an irresponsible manner.  The Duggars claim they are just doing what God would want them to do – repopulate the entire earth. Don’t hand me any of that nonsense about the family paying their own way blah blah… they are getting paid to be on TV – if they weren’t getting a handsome paycheque, I wonder how they would be paying for all these children. You wanna bet they are getting big help from a variety of corporate sponsors? They are also using this show as a vehicle to promote their “Financial Freedom” seminars and their book.  More fruits of child labour.

First, this cannot be healthy for the mother – she’s in a permanent state of pregnancy. 19 children? Mother Duggar must be worn out. It’s not like they don’t believe in birth control – they used it early in their marriage. But they say “we committed to God that we would leave the timing and amount of children in His hands.” Not only is God busy helping football players win games, he’s now busy working as birth control for families who refuse to take on the responsibility. I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with people who use God as an excuse for their own excesses. They are as useful as parents who use their children as props for a TV career. I think what annoys me the most, is anyone who dares criticise the Duggars is labeled anti-Christian or self-righteous. Sorry, but using children like this is wrong. Don’t care what your reasons are, putting them in the glare of such intense scrutiny cannot be healthy for their mental growth.

Drive-by photoshopping

Posted by catpaw on Monday, 26 October, 2009

Help, help … my arm won’t stop growing….

Gap picture

Gap picture

This is from the current Gap Clothing web site…. Dunno about you but she doesn’t look like she’s leaning to one side … so unless the woman is a hunchback, this photo has been over photoshopped. Then again there is the possibility her left arm really does reach down to her kneecap.  Strange thing is the other pictures all show her arms the same length. Just what was going on in the little pea brain of the photoshop criminal?

And here I laboured under the delusion the company hired professional graphic artists. Silly cat.

Dear Burger King

Posted by catpaw on Thursday, 9 July, 2009

Dear Burger King,

I’ve written before about your ill advised advertisements and the lack of judgement shown by both those  who create your ad campaigns and by those who approve them.  Your company shows an appalling insensitivity and astounding lack of common sense. Your latest ad, showing a Hindu Goddess floating atop a hamburger simply re-inforces my opinion that there is serious rot at the top of the food chain within your company.

Now I’m not Hindu – matter of fact I’m an unrepentant agnostic with touches of atheism at the fringes – but even I found your last ad, from Spain, breath-taking in it’s stupidity. Do you wonder why your market share has dropped? As a global chain, you should be aware of how your ads will play. Granted, the Hindu population is not your target market, but that does not allow you to be offensive, insensitive and down right idiotic in your behaviour. To paraphrase a line I used in a previous, unrelated post “Is it too much to ask for a modicum of common sense?”

By hijacking a symbol from another culture and faith, Lakshmi, the Indian goddess of wealth, and slapping her over top your Texas Whopper, you display the worst elements of  Insensitive Westerner. You further aggravated the problem by later offering up this  lame-ass apology “We are apologising because it wasn’t our intent to offend anyone. Burger King Corporation values and respects all of its guests as well as the communities we serve. This in-store advertisement was running to support only local promotion for three restaurants in Spain and was not intended to offend anyone.” It is obvious, even to the casual observer that Burger King has nothing but contempt for the public at large or it wouldn’t keep dishing out it’s noxious, “cutting edge” ads. It wasn’t your intent to offend anyone? You value and respect all of its guests? Wow, did it not occur to anyone that the misuse of a sacred symbol from a culture that DOES NOT ALLOW THE CONSUMPTION OF BEEF to flog coronary busting burgers might, just might, offend someone?

This apology doesn’t cut it. It’s simply a case of “If we get caught, then we’ll simper and apologise”. Let’s see, this year, sex charged and degrading ads aimed at children, insulting Mexico to sell the whopper and now this? All in less than a year? How many times do you have to apologise for these blunders before you realise your ads are not edgy, they are just stupid and offensive. I for one am sick and tired of your sad, bad and pathetic ads.

catpaw

Boycott Burger King until they grow up.

Creepy ass corporate award goes to ….

Posted by catpaw on Thursday, 16 April, 2009

Well done Burger King. Nothing like sleaze and degradation to sell kids meal hamburgers. Your latest mis-entry into the advertising world, featuring a Sponge Bob spoof, does nothing but degrade women. In this age of enlightened thinking, it’s always nice to know there are still some knuckle dragging Neanderthals still at work in the corporate world.

What in hell are you thinking allowing this sexist, obnoxious travesty to promote a CHILD’s MEAL. What do scantily clad girls, having their butts patted by some creepy ass-ed, plastic faced cretin, have to do with a child’s meal promotion? Or should I say pornmotion? Who are you kidding with this? It’s not edgy, it’s sad and pathetic. Edgy is creative. It does not try to degrade women who are a large portion of the buying public.

What? Did you forget that women have been allowed to go out in public all on their lonesome for quite some time now? Did you not realise women buy hamburgers, often for the family? Liberation must be such a bitch to you! I mean, women treated as humans? Heavens! What next? Allow them the vote? NEVER you say!  Bad enough you’ve alienated an entire country with your insulting Texmex commercials, now you’ve succeeded in insulting over half the world’s population – ohhhhh good marketing strategy there boys! What a busy, busy week you’ve had.

I think Burger King needs to stop hiring 14 year old boys with boob and ass fetishes and grow the hell up.

… and you wonder why your shares are falling! You think it might have something to do with the sexist sleaze you are churning out. You are selling food not prostitution or have you forgotten what your own product is?

Boycott Burger King!

Who writes this stuff?

Posted by catpaw on Sunday, 22 March, 2009

I wonder who writes the headers for some of the spam that hits my mailbox. Here’s the latest example:

Take her breath away when you pull your pants down

Make your love locomotive fill her tunnel

Love locomotive? To the writers of spam, please note, NO ADULT talks like this. Or at least not without breaking out into hysterical laughter, thereby killing any chance of getting lucky with Ms Luvvv Tunnel.

If you find this appealing, you should have your credit cards cut up immediatly. You obviously are not mature enough to have them.

Maybe we can take up a collection and send the creators of this type of Harlequin Spam to some kind of a remedial writing class.