Archive for category Fashion industry

Scrapping the bottom of the barrel… yet again

Posted by catpaw on Wednesday, 4 August, 2010

Every once in awhile, the fashion industry does something that makes even my jaw drop. Hard to believe, given my utter contempt for it, but recently they didn’t just hit rock bottom with their desperate attempt to garner attention, they dug themselves all the way to Hell.

In an ode to bankrupt ideals, South Korean fashion label Lewitt commissioned a short film (now yanked from every site I checked) that featured model Abbey Lee Kershaw fleeing from an unidentified danger and throwing herself off a roof. She is then shown falling over and over, in slow motion, wearing a different outfit with each fall. It’s done in a dreamy, romanticized way that is supposed to evoke a sense of “Ohh I want that”.

The problems with this are many fold. First, it is another attempt by the fashion industry to glamorize violence against women… again. Somehow this poor waif-like creature who commits suicide to escape whatever peril she is in, is supposed to be envied because she’s wearing must-have outfits. Hmm yes I want to wear what a dead woman is wearing – tres chic! We’ve seen this over and over in the past. The most egregious was the “murder as fashion” segment of an America’s Top Model episode.

Second, in doing a bit of research before hitting the keyboard, I discovered South Korea has the 8th highest suicide rate in the world, the second highest (just a hair under Mainland China) in female suicides. You would think, or hope, a company from a country rocked by numerous high profile suicides – including one of the country’s top models, Daul Kim – would show just a bit more common sense. Compassion is never going to happen, common sense is all we can hope for.

Daul Kim’s sad death at the age of 20 seems to have no effect on the people who treat women like nothing more than cattle ready for the slaughter. The fashion industry is not solely responsible for Kim’s death in Nov 2009; she was haunted by many demons that were aggravated by her career. Nor are they solely responsible for the high rate of suicide within South Korea. HOWEVER, they do bear responsibility for exploiting women and creating monumentally unrealistic visions of beauty that push girls and women to extremes to meet this phantom of beauty. The unending stream of warped images from the advertising and fashion industry must have an effect. We can’t simply say don’t watch them or worse don’t pay attention to them because this is hopelessly naive.

Blog after blog exposes the over photo-shopped models who have had limbs moved into positions that are anatomically impossible, breasts air brushed away (or in one case moved so low they were sitting just above the poor woman’s navel), thinned so badly the women look like sick bobble heads, belly buttons removed (just what is the industry’s obsession with belly buttons?), elongating arms and legs to the point the women resemble something out of a sci-fi movie, fingers elongated to such an extreme I wonder if the people doing the work even know what a female body looks like. If they want clothes hangers, stop the hypocrisy and put the damned clothes on hangers. Stop redesigning the human body to suit these warped views, and start showing women that come in all shapes, all sizes.

The industry bears a great responsibility for exploiting the notion that violence and fear is glamorous. That somehow brutalizing the vulnerable and weak is acceptable, even envied. I’ve used the term bankrupt ideals before, but it is the only phrase that can fully explain an industry that celebrates self-abuse and violence. No other industry would get away with promoting this type of agenda. Why do they get away with it? Because the world idolizes everything the industry does. They are the neo-gods of the modern world. Legions of magazines drool over every design, and quote even the most inane blatherings from designers who live in a world where they can abuse the female image and be rewarded for their efforts. They seemed to have forgotten Hubert de Givenchy’s statement on fashion, “The dress must follow the body of a woman, not the body following the shape of the dress.”

We’ve endured “heroin chic”, size zero or go home, designers who show open contempt for the female body in their battle against “plus size” models, murder as a fashion statement and now this. When is enough, enough?

There is nothing wrong with wanting tall, willowy models to showcase your work. There is something wrong with photo-shopping the models until they look like they are about to die from malnutrition or redo their bodies to suit a perverse image of what they think the female body should be. There is something wrong with using violence and emotional desperation to sell a warped image of beauty. There is something wrong with an industry that hectors it’s employees (and yes models are employees) to such an extent that anorexia and bulimia are the bywords for employment.

A remedial course in anatomy should be mandatory before anyone is allowed to work in either the fashion industry or advertising (kissing cousins in maintaining high standards of stupidity). This won’t happen until the world stops treating everything the fashion industry does with such reverence. They are employers who exploit their workers and their audience.

Suicide in South Korea
Frockwriter’s blog on the subject
Photoshop Disasters blog they spotlight the entire advertising industry’s misuse of over-touching photos.

Catpaw the Unfashionable vents on the fashion industry … again

Posted by catpaw on Sunday, 10 January, 2010

Before going any further, you need to understand one very important thing – I don’t have a lot of respect for the fashion industry. If you’ve read any of my previous posts you will know that I believe those high up  in the fashion business are completely disconnected from the real world. They have no respect for the female form and have attempted to rework the female body into something unrecognisable. They should stop lieing – if they want their women’s clothing modeled by little boys, then stop the pretense and put little boys in their cloths – don’t keep sheering off women’s curves to suit their warped body dis-morphia.

There are some truly gifted designers out there – men and women who create fashions for real people. Designers who respect the human shape. But they seem few and far between anymore.  I do get a giggle trolling through fashion websites to see just how silly the industry can be. Case in point? Givenchy’s 2010 Spring Ready to Wear collection. Check these out:

givench-2010 coneheadgivenchy_ss2010_5

WOW – the Coneheads are coming! The pants alone are migraine inducing, but the little pointy dunce caps send this design right into silly land. The one on the left looks like she’s a cross between a Conehead and an angry Smurfette. Now there’s an image – Smurfs from the darkside. **shudder** The design could be passable – not to my taste, but then really who cares. By plunking pointy hats on their heads, Givenchy transcends all my low expectations of the industry. No intelligent woman would be caught dead wandering down the street wearing a traffic cone on her head.

Mind you, the women came off much better than the men:

givenchy-2010-spring-rtw-collection-12-274x400ryan-givenchy

When I looked at the shimmery gold number I blurted out “WTF?” WOW … again. Love the executioners hood though. It just makes the ensemble, don’t you think? The shirt sleeves are divine! But where’s the rest of the t shirt?

The real shame is that there were a few designs that looked pretty good to me – yea, I know, I was shocked all to hell too. But I had to look very hard to find something that didn’t make me laugh my head off.

Now I know why so many models are so po-faced – they are just embarrassed.

Maintaining standards to a new low

Posted by catpaw on Monday, 4 January, 2010

Oh what a silly world this is. We are inundated with the myth that looks are everything and beauty is a high goal. Talent, hardwork character? They are often thought of as a by-word for “ugly”. The fashion industry, Hollywood, magazines, advertising – I believed those who ran these industries had plumbed the depths of narrow minded shallowness, but along comes a dating website called “Beautiful People” that proves, no matter how low society goes, there’s always another group willing to pick up the shovel and burrow even deeper.

Beautiful People touts itself as a dating service for the the good looking. Look up the words shallow, vain and idiotic and you will see this website as the entry. Here is a snippet from their website:

  • Do looks matter to you, when it comes to selecting a partner?
  • Do you want to guarantee your dates will always be beautiful?
  • No more filtering through unattractive people on mainstream sites
  • Meet beautiful people locally and from around the world – now

Oh and in case you think you are “Too ugly to sign up” the owners will let you ‘browse” the beautiful people, I guess to rub our collective noses in what we are missing. What noblesse oblige! I couldn’t help but break out in spasms of laughter over the incredibly juvenile attitude of the site. Nice to know some people think high school cliques are the height of social evolution! Now I have no problem with the notion that looks influence our choices, but to base an entire relationship on being “beautiful” is begging for disaster.

But the last laugh came today. Evidently far too many of the beautiful folks gained a bit of weight over the holidays and were purged from the the site. Approximately 5,000 former perfect people were turfed because they had the nerve to “let themselves go” over the holidays. Now… I can’t help wondering how the owners of the site knew this already. Christmas decorations have barely been put away yet, the gods of Beautiful People were able to peer in their crystal ball and see how much weight each person has gained. Did the offenders boast about their Christmas fat? Are they being spied upon? Or is this just another bit of silly headline grabbing on the part of the desperately shallow?

I think all the “ugly” people in the world should flood the site with applications. Keep the silly gits busy filtering out we imperfect sorts. Maybe we can sign up with the same pictures and see if they even notice. Now that would be fun.

Eau de toe

Posted by catpaw on Monday, 7 December, 2009

I don’t know. I think my vision is going wonky.  I was in a store the other day and kept seeing an ad for Halston perfume for men and each time I saw the ad I kept thinking hmmm… what’s wrong with this picture. Take a look:

halsonmanNow… tell me … does that look like a big toe floating in a bottle? It does to me… Try as I might, I can’t figure out what the design is supposed to be, I just can’t get past the toe-in-bottle image. I suppose it’s supposed to be a reflection of some sort, but nope, still see an amputated toe in a fancy bottle, no matter how I turn the image around. Anyone have an idea as to what this is supposed to represent?

Drive-by photoshopping

Posted by catpaw on Monday, 26 October, 2009

Help, help … my arm won’t stop growing….

Gap picture

Gap picture

This is from the current Gap Clothing web site…. Dunno about you but she doesn’t look like she’s leaning to one side … so unless the woman is a hunchback, this photo has been over photoshopped. Then again there is the possibility her left arm really does reach down to her kneecap.  Strange thing is the other pictures all show her arms the same length. Just what was going on in the little pea brain of the photoshop criminal?

And here I laboured under the delusion the company hired professional graphic artists. Silly cat.

More caffiene driven ramblings

Posted by catpaw on Wednesday, 21 October, 2009

You know… the picture I posted yesterday? The one of Vampirella on the Beach? It scares the sh*t out of me. Every time I logged on today and it popped up, I jumped. Holy Crap Batman, what were they thinking to create such a truly horrible picture? And who were they kidding – sex on the beach? Nah uh… this creature is more apt to eat her mate after a romp in the hay. I can’t get the image out of my head now – it burns!! Please make the horrible picture go away.

As an antidote, I present another edition of Catpaw’s You Ask the Question and I Supply the Smart Ass Answer. For those that are unfamiliar with this, let me explain. I pilfer the questions from another site – WikiAnswers. I then supply an answer I would dearly love to leave but can’t because I’d get my hands slapped and then be bounced off the site. The Wiki folks are funny that way. But some of the questions just BEG for a stupid answer. Some questions are quite innocent, but leave themselves open to interpretation and others are so illiterate, well…it feels like shooting fish in a barrel. This is where I get to abuse the exclamation mark shamelessly.

Let the games begin:

Is new york a blue state?
Yes…yes it is. The prozac dumped into the water supply should help.

In Lord of the Flies chapter 1 what was all over Ralph’s face?
Stop being so bloody lazy and open up the book. This is in the FIRST chapter for god’s sake. I’ll accept laziness once you read up to the 6th chapter, but no sooner!

What is a physical change when burning a log?
Puberty??? ???This is when I also get to abuse question marks ???

What year was the friction invented?
This question is fun on so many levels. I especially like the use of THE friction. I can’t figure out whether this is a science question or a literature question. Do they mean when was theory of friction formulated or what year was fiction as a literary device created?

Who was it that born before his father and died before his mother?
Bwahahahahahahaha…..

How many stages does a water boatman go through as a nymph?
This is a legitimate question, and a good one… unless part of your degree is in English Lit and you don’t read the question correctly. I immediately flashed onto Greek mythology and tales of water nymphs and then proceeded to have a serious break with reality.

Can you still inject expired flu vaccine?
Yes you can. I think the question should be Is it wise to inject expired flu vaccine?

Do aliens have ray guns?
Why yes we do! Would you like a demonstration?

What is an eye brown?
I haven’t the faintest idea on how to answer this.

Who was in the french revolution war?
I’ll hazard a guess and say … oh … um …. the French? (Found in the category American Revolution)

How many cubits high did the water rise?
Can we have the rest of the question?

(This was found in the How to Spell category)
What does Drinking Kocane and PCP do to you?
Well for starters it kills your brain’s ability to differentiate between categories. It also destroys the specific area in the brain that helps you spell.

How much fish in ocean?
Lemme grab a pencil and paper and get back to you. 1 fish, 2 fish, red fish, blue fish…. damn … that fish has 6 colours …. 6 fish oh wait… hang on …. damn…. 1 fish, 2 fish…

Shakespeare’s day for trick or treating?
Now I’m curious… did little Willy Shakespeare go trick or treating? If he did what was his favourite costume?

What is the first thing you need to by so you can be ready to germinate?
Hee hee… I think you left something out of this question … hee hee… no … really… you did….

What does blue diamond tattoo symbolize?
You are really, really crazy about a certain brand of almonds.

Does a ladybug have a tongue?
Crap! Now you have me wondering! Thanks a lot. As if I didn’t already have an obsessive enough personality…

Is Bolivia north south east or west?
Of what? A little help here.

What is the mayor’s last name?
Smith? Jones? Zwicker? Pick one, I’m sure it will work.

What animal only lives in Pennslyvania?
The rare and hard to spot Pennsylvania groundhog. It lives in burrows and dens along the great, heather covered dunes along the coastline. It is easily identified by it’s spotted striped coat of many colours. (You just know some kid would cut and paste this into their homework and hand it in. Don’t you wish you could see the look on the teacher’s face?)

Write 100 as the sum of two prime numbers in six different ways?
Cheater, cheater, cheater!

There shold be no school uniforms
Is there a question in there?

There that should hold you for awhile…