Archive for category Really stupid ideas

History according to WikiAnswers

Posted by catpaw on Thursday, 26 August, 2010

I’m going to rename my blog. I’m going to call it “Stupid things I’ve found on WikiAnswers”. They have a motto over there “There are no stupid questions”. I used to believe this… before I began looking around W/A. After reading a number of the answers I’ve given up on that faint hope.

Now don’t get me wrong, there are great people over there that labour valiantly against the tide of illiteracy, ignorance and arrogance. Unfortunately a few of the worse offenders of misinformation are the supervisors themselves. Sometimes there is a hint of the truth buried in the details of their answers which gives the answers a air of legitimacy. But bad information is still bad, no matter how hard you try to twist the facts to fit your personal take on history. I write this primarily as a cautionary tale for people to be careful where you get your information. Have faith, but not in what you find on the Internet.

I had a running battle with one of the supervisors over the origins of baseball and for the final time “NO ABNER DOUBLEDAY DID NOT INVENT IT!!” The first documented game occurred in Beachville, Ontario on June 4, 1838 long before Doubleday came on the scene. But this supervisor relentlessly posts it was good ole’ Abner despite being shown evidence this was a fiction that no baseball historian believes.

This self-confessed historian also insisted that the participants in the Boston Tea Party were “Smugglers of Dutch tea. They didn’t like it because the British had lowered the tax on tea and would cost them money.” I can’t even begin to understand this answer. She repeatedly inserts the tea was too cheap argument into answers. High school history was a couple of decades ago, but if memory serves me, it was high taxes (among a number of other issues) that sparked the Tea Party, not cheap tea. She has this fascinating take on the Revolution, that it was basically a plot by tea smugglers to keep the price of tea artificially inflated to maximise profits. She often calls the smugglers Dutch tea smugglers, which implies the Dutch themselves were involved in the Revolution.

She loves to write answers that are partially correct and erase additional information made by other people. Here is an excellent example:
Who were the Sons of Liberty and Daughters of Liberty?
There was only the Sons of Liberty and they comprised 12 men before the American Revolution.
The answer was partially correct. The words Sons of Liberty and the American Revolution were good. Other than that … no. There were Sons and Daughters of Liberty, their existence is well documented.

She isn’t content to tamper with just American history, she revises … well … just about every bit of history:
Where did the medieval people get clothes?
Here answer was: Clothing was made by hand either from wool or linen. Most people wore a wool tunic in the Roman fashion.
This is partially correct. But it doesn’t deal with nobility. Someone added much more detail but she erased it. So now we have people wandering around thinking Kings and peasants wore the same clothing.

What were medieval teachers called?
There weren’t schools or teachers in the middle ages. So, they weren’t called anything. About 90% of the population couldn’t read or write.
Well, I guess that answers that. Just don’t tell any of the Universities that were formed during the Medieval period. She is correct about the illiteracy, but to erase centuries of intellectual history because you don’t either pick up a book or use Google to verify your statement, is baffling. A quick search on the Internet called up dozens of credible links dealing with the history of Medieval Universities.

What kind of animals would be killed in a middle ages butcher shop?
There was no butcher shop and people caught or grew the animals that they killed. You have to remember there was no good method to keep meat fresh, so it was killed and eaten the same day. Types of meat eaten were beef, lamb, goat, chicken, fowl of all sorts, hare, rabbit, deer, eels, boar, pork.
This isn’t just wrong, it’s nonsense. They ate what they killed the same day? There were methods of preservation and NO people did not eat an entire deer in one day. For the record, butchers have been around a long, long time. Butchers Guilds were formed as early as the 1300′s, with many of the records still around. This was an honoured profession. The guilds broke down butchering into various levels of skill and types of meat/preservation etc required. Yet again, a quick search will take you to pages and pages on the history of the Guild of Butchers.

Did medieval explorers have ships?
There were no middle age explorers. Exploring didn’t start until the late 1400′s.
So much for the Portuguese explorers and Marco Polo. Oh well, they don’t count I guess.

There are pages and pages of this type of nonsense. I make jokes about them, but periodically I become stressed because I know people take the answers as the truth. It’s becoming easier for historical revisionists to rework history, because they have a ready and eager audience who will believe whatever you post on the Internet. Just sound like you know what you are saying and Voila! Instant history remake. The inherent problem with WikiAnswers, it has a large student audience. I shutter to think of some of the homework being handed in. If you have supervisors, the gatekeepers of information, posting nonsense, how can we trust the source.

I think my will to live is being sapped out of me. As I said in a previous post “my pain is your pain”. Here are a random sampling of some of the more ludicrous answers given to legitimate questions. For the record, none of the answers were supplied by my favourite bugaboo supervisor. These are just random folks piping in with their answers.

After ww2 what countries did Russia take over?
none except the country of Georgia and Georgia is free after fighting. East Berlin is still controlled by Russian Government.

Are stasi the secret German police?
The Stasi, known as SS, are the secret German (Nazi) police and bodyguards for Hitler. They were the feared warriors of the Nazis. They had a fighting group that was considered one of the best fighting groups the Allied Forces had ever encountered. They were also called The Waffen SS. The SS would kill a person without provocation. So the general populous really feared them.
Do you want to sigh now? Go ahead, get it out of your system. It will only get worse as you read on.

How were wounded soldiers treated after returning home from world war 1?
Harry Houdini saved money and donated it to help the wounded soldiers after world war I
Actually, I rather liked this answer. It was so, divinely cockeyed. Didn’t answer the question, but it was fun.

WHEN did Russia leave the war war in world war 1?
When the Soviet Union was formed, Russia was to busy capturing small closer nations to make themselves stronger the signed treaty with the Allies and later on allied with Germany. It was until world war 2 when there allies were broken with the German invasion of the Soviet Union.
This was a real potpourri of inaccurate information cloaked in misinformation, hidden under a kernel of truth.

Is religion a big part of england’s people?
… Many claim they are believers but they do little with that belief to the consternation of the spiritual leaders and the Queen of England. She is a very devout and devoted born again Christian.
Elizabeth, born-again Christian? Do you want to call Number 10 and warn them or shall I?

Who did the Germans attack in1939?
The Germans attacked Poland in 1939 then kicked the Poles out of their own country and next he moved his own Germans into Poland. He put the Polish Jews into concentration camps.
Ah that old mistruth cloaked in a kernal of truth. I’m not sure which is worse, the incorrect information or the idea that there is a hint of legitimacy to it that makes it so hard to put down.

Did winston churchill have syphlis?
No, Winston Churchill did not have syphillis. He was a family man and did not contract STDs.
Oh yea, no one has ever, ever cheated on their spouse and brought home an unwanted souvenir from their dalliances. No married man has ever contracted syphillis. Randolph Churchill was supposed to have contracted syphillis although there are some reports that have cast doubt on this.

What year did the Holocaust happen?
1941 until 1945
This is so wrong. So terribly wrong. So very, very wrong. No wonder Holocaust deniers are having a field day. So much misinformation is being passed off as fact, it is making it more difficult to stem the tide of denial.

Be very careful where you get your information from. If you have a child in school, for the love of all education, vet the places they are getting their “facts” from. Check and then triple check the information. Better yet, a quick trip to the library might provide a reliable way of checking the information gathered.

Be afraid, be very afraid.

The demise of common sense

Posted by catpaw on Monday, 31 May, 2010

I wrote that title and then realised common sense has been absent in a large portion of society for a very long time.  But every once in awhile, I find myself shaking my head in utter disbelief at the level of monumental stupidity, and arrogance of those who want to be rewarded for their moment in the Darwinian sun.

It’s never a good idea when stupidity and greed marry, it inevitably ends up in a lawsuit. Take for instance the woman in Utah who walked onto a busy highway and was hit by a car. Who does she blame? Herself? Oh silly reader, you should know better by now. Of course she isn’t to blame. It was the driver on the highway she strolled out on and Google Maps for supplying her with the information:

As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant Google’s careless, reckless, and negligent providing of unsafe directions, Plaintiff Laren Rosenberg was led onto a dangerous highway, and was thereby stricken by a motor vehicle

Yes the main plaintiff is Google Maps because it didn’t warn her it could be dangerous stepping out onto a road – busy or otherwise. Yes, it was a newsflash to me that you need to look both ways and use judgment before crossing the road, but I’m funny that way. No where on the Google Maps page does it say the path shown is safe or traffic free. It is assumed the user should use certain amount of caution regardless of the route. Simply because the path has been supplied by Google Maps, does not mean the user does not have to exercise due care and caution. The main question that should be asked of this person is “do you normally step onto a road/highway without looking”?

An element of personal responsibility comes into this entire sorry episode. Ultimately it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to look both ways before crossing the road or choosing to walk along a busy highway. It is not Google’s responsibility to hold her hands. They made no promises the route was traffic free. They simply supplied a path from point A to point B. If she had looked at a paper map and followed the same route would she sue Rand McNally? Is she going to sue BlackBerry for displaying the route?

As a user of Google Maps, I am rather ticked off. Never in my wildest dreams would I blindly follow a set of instructions. I use the route as a reference only. I wouldn’t walk out into traffic, I wouldn’t walk off (or drive off) a bridge as happened to some, I would not drive into a corn field because the map said to. While I was researching this story, I was shocked by the number of people who wrote Google was sued for giving bad directions. No Google did not give bad directions. Google did what it was asked to do – supply a pedestrian route. It was not asked to supply a route that was car free. The user opted to suspend common sense and put the onus for her safety onto the shoulders of everyone around her.

Perhaps Google Maps should be suing her for bad publicity and egregious use of their mapping tool.

Ohhh… so close but …

Posted by catpaw on Wednesday, 19 May, 2010

The Royal Bank of Canada was targeted by a shadowy group called Direct Action in Ottawa. One of the RBC banks was firebombed the other day by this group as part of their protest against RBC and greater corporate Kanada. Like most groups that commit stupid crimes that endanger the innocent, they posted their manifesto shortly after the attack. Here is a snippet:


“Royal Bank Canada is one of the planet’s greenest companies” according to one of its own brochures. Coporate Kanada saw fit to include RBC as one of the top 50 in a competition dubbed Canada’s Greenest Employers, which purports to recognize organizations that have created “a culture of environmental awareness.” Yet RBC is now the major financier of Alberta’s tar sands, one of the largest industrial projects in human history and perhaps the most destructive. The tar sands, now the cause of the second fastest rate of deforestation on the planet, are slated to expand several times its current size.

Dudes! I’d take your manifesto a wee bit more seriously if you hadn’t been caught on camera driving away in an SUV! Come one. If you are going to attack “Corporate Kanada” for it’s anti environmental activities, the least you could do is drive up to the site you are going to firebomb in a Smart Car. Seriously – an SUV? I hope it was at least a hybrid. Maybe you can contact the makers of Smart Cars and get them to sponsor you. Or better yet, ride up on a bicycle.  Now that’s environmentally conscientious!

What makes me think these nobs don’t see the irony of  using an SUV to strike in the name of environmentalism.

Oh yea, this is something to brag about!

Posted by catpaw on Tuesday, 11 May, 2010

Today, Common Sense and Personal Pride died. They both crawled away into a dark corner and died of embarrassment. Despite  fighting a long and difficult battle against people who never understood the concept of “too much information” and “bad sharing”, they were ambushed by a rear guard of “what do you mean this should be private information”. They fought a valiant battle, but were mortally wounded yesterday and never recovered.

It became obvious to both Sense and Pride that there was no longer any hope the world would improve. Their last whimpers  uttered were “but it isn’t something to brag about”. With those last words, they hugged each other and slipped from this world.

There will be no funeral services. A candle light vigil will be held in their honour this weekend. Common Sense and Personal Pride  were predeceased by their  children Fashion Sense, Modesty and Politeness.

Face book posting found the other day. Wonder if he was sitting in the doctor’s office when he posted it.

Stupidity central

Posted by catpaw on Wednesday, 21 April, 2010

“Many women who do not dress modestly … lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which increases earthquakes,” Ayatollah Kazem Sedighi was quoted as saying by Iranian media…. “What can we do to avoid being buried under the rubble?” Sedighi asked during a prayer sermon last week. “There is no other solution but to take refuge in religion and to adapt our lives to Islam’s moral codes.”

Is it my imagination or is this one of the single stupidest observations made this decade? I know, I know, there is a lot of competition for this coveted award. But seriously, what is this man smoking that makes him think this? Has he not heard of tectonic plates? Movement of the earth’s crust? No, logic is asking too much. It’s easier to blame women.

Now that I’m on this rant, why is it always the woman’s fault? What about men taking responsibility for their actions? Maybe men should be locked up because they are so incredibly weak they can be corrupted by nothing more than a wanton glance from a woman. Women must be incredibly powerful if they can lead men astray AND cause earthquakes with a flutter of their eyelashes. Oh look we can also bake cakes, beat off home invaders, wash the dishes, corrupt the morals of young men and leap buildings in a single bound.  Hmmm maybe if we put our minds to it we could make narrow minded bigoted misogynists spontaneously combust. Concentrating… concentrating… damn… didn’t work.

Mmm, love the irony

Posted by catpaw on Thursday, 4 February, 2010

I was cruising around the TTC (Toronto Transit Commission) web site and spotted this little gem. You can sign up to get your monthly transit pass via snail mail. Fill out a nifty little form and supply a voided cheque and voila, no line ups to get your pass. It simply shows up in your mailbox in a timely fashion. Cool, eh?

Now… there’s one little problem with the form you fill out on line. Take a look:

In order to get your advanced TTC pass, they require your driver’s license. I don’t have a problem with requiring some sort of ID for security, but … seriously, a driver’s license? I know quite a few TTC users that don’t have a driver’s license, it really isn’t a necessity in Toronto. So they can’t fill out the form – they get rejected.

Yes, yes, I know, you can still buy your pass at the kiosks or booths. But there is a certain irony in an organisation that is promoting mass transit, requiring users to show a driver’s license to get a mass transit pass via mail.

You think the TTC could come up with a few choices for proof of ID.  A little bit of imagination is called for.