Archive for category Terrorism

Ohhh… so close but …

Posted by catpaw on Wednesday, 19 May, 2010

The Royal Bank of Canada was targeted by a shadowy group called Direct Action in Ottawa. One of the RBC banks was firebombed the other day by this group as part of their protest against RBC and greater corporate Kanada. Like most groups that commit stupid crimes that endanger the innocent, they posted their manifesto shortly after the attack. Here is a snippet:


“Royal Bank Canada is one of the planet’s greenest companies” according to one of its own brochures. Coporate Kanada saw fit to include RBC as one of the top 50 in a competition dubbed Canada’s Greenest Employers, which purports to recognize organizations that have created “a culture of environmental awareness.” Yet RBC is now the major financier of Alberta’s tar sands, one of the largest industrial projects in human history and perhaps the most destructive. The tar sands, now the cause of the second fastest rate of deforestation on the planet, are slated to expand several times its current size.

Dudes! I’d take your manifesto a wee bit more seriously if you hadn’t been caught on camera driving away in an SUV! Come one. If you are going to attack “Corporate Kanada” for it’s anti environmental activities, the least you could do is drive up to the site you are going to firebomb in a Smart Car. Seriously – an SUV? I hope it was at least a hybrid. Maybe you can contact the makers of Smart Cars and get them to sponsor you. Or better yet, ride up on a bicycle.  Now that’s environmentally conscientious!

What makes me think these nobs don’t see the irony of  using an SUV to strike in the name of environmentalism.

Yea, I know this is old news

Posted by catpaw on Monday, 18 January, 2010

I realise this is old news, but what can I say – the Right Wing have been busy lately. Last week former New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani went on “Good Morning America” and made this bold statement:

“what [Obama] should be doing is following the right things that Bush did.” (I’m working on figuring out what those things were. If I figure it out, I’ll let you know) …”We had no domestic attacks under Bush, …We’ve had one under Obama.”

Later he amended the statement by saying he had omitted to include the words “since 9/11″. Oh that makes it all right then! We’ll just forget about Richard Reid the shoe bomber shall we?

Former Bush press secretary, Dana Perino, said in November that the Clinton administration was to blame for the 9/11 attacks, which occurred  8 months after Clinton left office. I guess Bush should be forgiven for not having enough time to read the security alerts regarding Al Qaeda – the two syllable words must have stumped him. Bush was given a briefing a full month before 9/11 occurred, entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”, yet the Bush administration did nothing to stop the attacks. It came out later that, despite growing concerns and warnings from the intelligence community in the US, the Bush administration didn’t follow up the warnings, nor did any of Bush’s advisors try to discuss the issue with the President again. Despite the overwhelming evidence that a terrorist attack did occur on US soil under the Bush administration, in November, after the Fort Hood attack, Perino said “We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during Bush’s term”.



Are these people memory impaired? Or are they laying the groundwork for the next election by reworking history? Not a group to let facts stymie them for long, they simply prevaricate (if you are a Bush/Palin fan, you might want to buy a d-i-c-t-i-o-n-a-r-y). If you repeat the lie enough, you begin to believe it. As will large numbers of voters. In rehabilitating George Bush’s reputation, they are making it easier for Palin (or any other far right candidate) to establish the moral high ground for any future elections. What’s next? Burning all the footage of 9/11 and all books that mention it?

Who knew?

Posted by catpaw on Thursday, 3 December, 2009

Did you know Somalia had a Minister for Tourism? I almost fell out of my chair in disbelief this morning when I read that. Can you think of a tougher job? Who would want to visit? With each tourist visa do they issue a flak jacket and your own personal bomb disposal unit? Is one of the tourist highlights the public stoning of some poor woman who contravened one of Al Shabab’s archaic and barbaric laws? Or better yet, can we play pirates for a day? I’d personally love to attack a French warship … oh wait, that was already tried and it really didn’t go over well.

With the hardline extremist group Al Shabab gaining so much control of Somalia, I think I’ll leave this country off my “must see list”

Justice, Rhode Island style

Posted by catpaw on Friday, 22 May, 2009

Rhode Island Senator Rod Driver has offered to donate money for every second George Bush, Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney hold their breath while being waterboarded. He said he would donate $100 per second to whatever charity the unholy trinity chooses.

Nice to see American ideals of right and wrong creeping back into the political arena.

Waterboard for charity

At least our politicians don’t expect us to clean their moats

Posted by catpaw on Tuesday, 12 May, 2009

If you are a follower of British politics, you will be aware of how the current government is circling the drain. Nothing less than a full blown miracle from the heavens will stop them from being devastated in the next elections. In a previous post, I wrote they were writing the definitive manual on how not to govern and this week has added yet another chapter.  A recurring theme is their complete inability to enforce realistic rules and limitations on their own party members. Instead of good governing, the British public have been saddled with a regime that is intent upon chipping away their rights and privacies to an extreme.

Think I’m exaggerating? Take a look at the new Terrorism laws that were enacted in Feb 2009. It does not allow the “elicit(ing), publish(ing) or communicat(ion of) information” about British police or military. This law is so broad, it could used to prevent the photographing of police – the venerable Bobby – by tourists. There have already been accusations of heavy handed use already, by tourists and local photographers. In 2005, in response to growing public hostility to their polices, the Labour party passed a law that effectively bans protests around Parliament – don’t want to disturb the precious ones during their noon hour account fiddling. The misuse of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, designed to fight terrorism, is well documented – it is being used to snoop on citizens who may be committing misdemeanors. The vast powers of terror surveillance are being used to track such heinous crimes as not picking up after your dog, noisy children and car boot sales. At times it seems every aspect of British life is now under scrutiny.

I’m not sure where the Labour politicians came from, but they are definitely not of the same breed that stood up to decades of IRA terrorism, doodlebugs and more. Instead of reassuring the public, they seek to restrict them to such a degree, the British people are chaffing under the Labour harness. Protection is needed, but not the repressive laws the current government relies upon.

As if this wasn’t bad enough, the government is also racked with a huge scandal over MP expenses. Politicians, from all parties, not just Labour, have their snouts so deep into the trough, they can’t see the public outrage mounting. Expenses for such things as pool cleaning, manure for gardens (550 sacks by one MP, if you are curious about that expenditure), mouse poison, inflated claims for second homes, house flipping, mole catching, multi room audio packages, DVD players, piano tuning, Tampax (claimed by a male MP), bread bins, cat food, dog food, chocolate (the cheap MP billed the public for a 59p chocolate Santa!), lamps, eye liner, cookies, tape measures, cordless drills, flat refurbishments, paying stamp duties, baby buggie and other essentials for new born (this claim was rejected), washing machines and driers, helipads, chandeliers, potato peeler, porn movies, jellied eels, repairs to driveways, ice cube tray, diapers, pizza wheel, plumbing, council tax dodges, cleaning a moat, the list goes on and on. The level of abuse is astounding, but it puts a bit of perspective on the recent economic collapse – how could the politicians act as watchdogs on the banking and real estate industry when they are so busy fleecing the public themselves. The rust on their change purse clasp must be pretty thick, because they never seem to pay for anything personal.

PM Gordon Brown’s tepid response was appalling. He blamed the system, not the MP’s who abused it. He took no action to force the MPs into line and address the situation. It wasn’t until the Conservative leader, David Cameron, took action against his own party fiddlers today, did Brown offer an  apology and pledge to change the system. If this promise is anything like the one offered to the Gurkhas recently, I’d run for cover if I lived in the UK.

When the Conservative party was outed as wastrels this week, Mr Cameron began hauling the abusers into his office and raking them over the coals. He has also said the money will be paid back. Leadership comes from the top down – not the other way around Mr Brown. The fact the abuses are on such a large scale and  in turn both monumentally extravagant and unbelievably petty, points to a deeper problem than either party is willing to admit. The political leadership is afflicted with the same sense of entitlement the banking world possessed before the Big Fall. There is a deep seated belief they have a right to claim these expenses and have the public pay for all. There doesn’t seem to be a notion of right and wrong, of responsibility to the citizens. They are so obsessed with hunting for terrorists and fattening their bank accounts, they have forgotten the day to day business of good government.

Wonderful – just bloody wonderful

Posted by catpaw on Tuesday, 5 May, 2009

As if being in Afghanistan isn’t dangerous enough, a group of Evangelical US soldiers are making the situation even worse by promoting their own evangelical agenda.

Soldiers were handing out bibles to this very, very conservative and largely illiterate nation. Just having a Bible in their possession could jeopardise the lives of the poor Afghan that does not understand they are being used in a new cold war between the Taliban and the Christian Right.  A number of accusations have flown in the past few years over the hijacking of the military by right wing Christian groups, this is just the latest. Listen carefully to the tape and you will see the soldiers involved know they are violating military policy, and to compound the violation, talk about ways of circumventing them. The US military said the Bibles in question have been destroyed. But a new question comes to mind: how has the US military allowed such open prostylization to occur?