Posts Tagged British Labour Party

At least our politicians don’t expect us to clean their moats

Posted by catpaw on Tuesday, 12 May, 2009

If you are a follower of British politics, you will be aware of how the current government is circling the drain. Nothing less than a full blown miracle from the heavens will stop them from being devastated in the next elections. In a previous post, I wrote they were writing the definitive manual on how not to govern and this week has added yet another chapter.  A recurring theme is their complete inability to enforce realistic rules and limitations on their own party members. Instead of good governing, the British public have been saddled with a regime that is intent upon chipping away their rights and privacies to an extreme.

Think I’m exaggerating? Take a look at the new Terrorism laws that were enacted in Feb 2009. It does not allow the “elicit(ing), publish(ing) or communicat(ion of) information” about British police or military. This law is so broad, it could used to prevent the photographing of police – the venerable Bobby – by tourists. There have already been accusations of heavy handed use already, by tourists and local photographers. In 2005, in response to growing public hostility to their polices, the Labour party passed a law that effectively bans protests around Parliament – don’t want to disturb the precious ones during their noon hour account fiddling. The misuse of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, designed to fight terrorism, is well documented – it is being used to snoop on citizens who may be committing misdemeanors. The vast powers of terror surveillance are being used to track such heinous crimes as not picking up after your dog, noisy children and car boot sales. At times it seems every aspect of British life is now under scrutiny.

I’m not sure where the Labour politicians came from, but they are definitely not of the same breed that stood up to decades of IRA terrorism, doodlebugs and more. Instead of reassuring the public, they seek to restrict them to such a degree, the British people are chaffing under the Labour harness. Protection is needed, but not the repressive laws the current government relies upon.

As if this wasn’t bad enough, the government is also racked with a huge scandal over MP expenses. Politicians, from all parties, not just Labour, have their snouts so deep into the trough, they can’t see the public outrage mounting. Expenses for such things as pool cleaning, manure for gardens (550 sacks by one MP, if you are curious about that expenditure), mouse poison, inflated claims for second homes, house flipping, mole catching, multi room audio packages, DVD players, piano tuning, Tampax (claimed by a male MP), bread bins, cat food, dog food, chocolate (the cheap MP billed the public for a 59p chocolate Santa!), lamps, eye liner, cookies, tape measures, cordless drills, flat refurbishments, paying stamp duties, baby buggie and other essentials for new born (this claim was rejected), washing machines and driers, helipads, chandeliers, potato peeler, porn movies, jellied eels, repairs to driveways, ice cube tray, diapers, pizza wheel, plumbing, council tax dodges, cleaning a moat, the list goes on and on. The level of abuse is astounding, but it puts a bit of perspective on the recent economic collapse – how could the politicians act as watchdogs on the banking and real estate industry when they are so busy fleecing the public themselves. The rust on their change purse clasp must be pretty thick, because they never seem to pay for anything personal.

PM Gordon Brown’s tepid response was appalling. He blamed the system, not the MP’s who abused it. He took no action to force the MPs into line and address the situation. It wasn’t until the Conservative leader, David Cameron, took action against his own party fiddlers today, did Brown offer an  apology and pledge to change the system. If this promise is anything like the one offered to the Gurkhas recently, I’d run for cover if I lived in the UK.

When the Conservative party was outed as wastrels this week, Mr Cameron began hauling the abusers into his office and raking them over the coals. He has also said the money will be paid back. Leadership comes from the top down – not the other way around Mr Brown. The fact the abuses are on such a large scale and  in turn both monumentally extravagant and unbelievably petty, points to a deeper problem than either party is willing to admit. The political leadership is afflicted with the same sense of entitlement the banking world possessed before the Big Fall. There is a deep seated belief they have a right to claim these expenses and have the public pay for all. There doesn’t seem to be a notion of right and wrong, of responsibility to the citizens. They are so obsessed with hunting for terrorists and fattening their bank accounts, they have forgotten the day to day business of good government.

Um… er .. well actually you can

Posted by catpaw on Friday, 8 May, 2009

I’ve been watching the governmental farce known as the British Labour Party in the UK. They seem to be intent upon writing the definitive manual on how not to govern and it has been highly entertaining. Their disgraceful handling of the Gurkhas, who have loyally served in the British army, brings to mind vintage Monty Python moments. If you haven’t been following this shambolic mess, check out the articles in the Daily Mail and the London Telegraph and the BBC.

In brief, some Gurkhas who have served in the Army would like to immigrate to the UK. While other nationalities that have served in the British Forces are allowed to move to the UK after 4 years of service, the Labour party slapped a 15 year and 20 year service requirement on the Gurkhas who served before 1997, among other idiot restrictions. No legitimate reason has ever been forthcoming as to why the Gurkhas were singled out for such restrictive requirements. The Labour government’s nasty policy shifting to keep the Gurkhas out of the UK gave the public appearance of some sort of vendetta against this group.  Despite overwhelming protests from the British public and within their own party ranks, in support of the Gurkhas the UK government continued to make promises, break them and then change the policy in an increasingly irrational manner. It wasn’t until actress Joanna Lumley (who’s father served with the Gurkhas in Burma during WW2) literally ambushed the Minister responsible for this embarrassment and demanded action, did the government concede it was high time to come to it’s senses and start acting in a honourable manner (or as honourably as that rotten lot can). As of today, the Labour Government has said they will recind the restrictions and keep their promises.

Oh… did I I just say “come to it’s senses”? Perhaps I didn’t choose my words carefully. The Minister for Immigration Phil Woolas uttered this memorable line earlier today when he tried to justify the governments bizarre policies:

‘I can’t say “let the nice people in and the nasty people not”. We have to have a law,’

Er… come again? Let’s hear that line again

‘I can’t say “let the nice people in and the nasty people not”. We have to have a law,’

I thought that was what he said. We can’t let nice people in and keep the nasty types out because it wouldn’t be fair. Hmmm well, yes you can. That is the government’s job – to protect the citizens of the country and ensure honest, hard working immigrants are allowed to settle in the UK. More precisely, that is HIS job. His statement implies the government has an obligation to allow murderers, thieves etc an equal opportunity to live in the UK because it wouldn’t be fair to them if only ‘good’ immigrants are allowed in. It also implies the government does not have the authority – moral or legal – to prevent undesirables from taking up residence in the UK. Contrary to what the Minister of the Without a Clue portfolio believes, the government does have the authority to do so. There is a “law” and it is enforceable. It is designed to protect both existing citizens and those who wish to become citizens. It boils down to Civics 101 – good immigration policies bring in hard working immigrants who boost the economy and become strong citizens. To say the “nasty people” have just as much right to immigrate is wishy washy primary school level twaddle. The Labour party has completely lost the plot.  They can’t govern, won’t govern and refuse to govern.

When he said this I swear you could hear the entire island suck in their breath and say “did he really admit to that?” It’s one thing to act in an irrational, arbitrary manner, it’s another thing to admit on national TV you don’t have a clue how to do your job.  How about we file this under Political Suicide, How to.